Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Friday, January 24, 2014

Third Times A Charm?

Or one too many mulligans?
(the rough, the fairway or the green)

David Horsey: "without green being a factor in making us see red."

Horsey's cartoon goes overboard on voters

At the risk of being obvious, I would like to comment on David Horsey's "Red & Blue America" (May 19). For the sake of humor, it went overboard in its characterizations of those who voted for George W. Bush or Al Gore. I hope it is a good thing if people realize, like I did, how we can see one side funnier or less overboard than the other.

I hope the humor can be less dividing than the colors pinned on Gore and Bush. It also made me realize that there may be value in using more colors, but somehow without green being a factor in making us see red.

[Personal Note:  See bold and italics bold. For apparently the italicized irony, "green" was replaced by "colors" by the editors.]  Not to condi send but, Nader was a factor along with chads.


More on Boehner and jobs later. i.e. the success and pop(ularity) of congress





Friday, August 02, 2013

Fiscal Charting

Format Change [!] (FP1)
W(m)D?  Wendy MessAge Davis (PTSD) Payback Time Standard Dime
NoW: Capital Dysfunction "Perception" BaneOr RawMaKnee?

[What the Fed? Or WTFudge!]

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Interesting Dig

With the talk that the President is on a "charm offensive" with his recent dinner invite, a look back at George W. Bush found these unrelated googles

FORMAT NOTE:  You read so I don't have to?*
I don't recall George W. Bush being especially charming in his first term with a Republican House and a split-Senate let alone hospitable to Clinton administration concerns about terrorism.  Isn't it interesting though that the Bush family had relations though with both the Hinkley and Bin Laden families.  I'm not saying there was a conspiracy, only that it is an interesting dig.  i.e. one find of the google (thanks to Al Gore Rythms)[!]

*There just so happens to be Six Links embedded above, but the interesting dig refers to the unrelated googles. (or R they?)
.

Thursday, January 03, 2013

Clog Alert!

Not to Ribble, but regarding two points here:
The tenor of Bane Or
Rather than footnote, I will say Ctrl F "anachronism..." and scroll over "speaking of speakers"
Note to Editor(i.e. me): review dating 4mat. Chuck Todd, Today Show (R)

A. Norman Goldman comments on Boner.(I say Bane Or...)
B. The political parsing of wills and divided government, not to joke about punchlines or politicians and lawyers or bitter pills.

Further parse N later ...  [^]

^ not [exactly]
Review Saved in^^ Draft and Tangents.
^^ 12-31-12 [!] ?  w h ?

[C-The Cyle: "Stuck on Repeat"  RE/A+B "Amen Gov" (...) or E-Moat-Iconn?  i.e. "Boehner in a Bind?" /// F B D (S.E. Drift)^^^ or working with hope? and case studies!(patton lee adsurd?)/(Re:N-dell) (M.C.Time**) Not my comity of journalism]*

^^^ live drafting
*[1-4-13 e-N-f  / Re:Turn to C? i.e. inserting links now.(& later*)
** must review re:hope? & *

Thursday, November 08, 2012

Middle C?

Hit it!
Awkward Segue?
Gracious Notes*?

(F'n) Bingo!**

Bottom Line ? [!]
or not ?

Not F'n...or vise verse us?










*unintended link redundancy potentially related to F'n(Tan Gent)Bingo/Bane or Fiscal Cliff

^



** C$(oops)C4? coom ba ya w/MSN Now ... Jansing?[Go Team Rendell v. Magic Pony?]
[Editor's note(as if): The last shot was my first shot on the scene from an Olympus D-550.  Like Romney's concession, and Boehnor's press conference, everything is Relative.^^  Not that it is a good shot, but compared to my others...this takes the cake...especially for timing... in relation to my retro trek(if you zoom).]
^^ mmmm Pizza [!] ? !
[not to mention AM(...grand bargain processing)]
MC nail-time.  Buh Dump Ump[!]...Ouch Retro. Scoop Dog...

11-22-12 [C-VC]

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Rubric's Peek

Not to mislede***, but I lost my original heading:
Recession imminent if ‘fiscal cliff’ of tax hikes, budget cuts not averted, CBO says.

My second shot, "Rubric's Peek" is a pun on a Peak at the way congress put it.
Now that is the ticket, something about B.S.* as in Bowles-Simpson or "balanced solutions"**, not to mention "bumper snickers".  It wasn't quite Sea QuestOr B.S. nor BaneOr C-Quest.


* "Off The Cliff-Notes" was not it.
(Maybe The B.S. Cliff /something.)
** place holder for better "off the cliff"notes.
i.e. not(nor) the link I hoped to find
*** the lede is this paragraph, Rubric's Peek my alternate heading

[I have refrained from overburdening with links, but did find a few that were interesting if not off the cliff. (at least prior to this sentence) And I still haven't found the simple explanation of the Fiscal Cliff, not exactly to ribble a hint: woof!]

Note: G'Ribble is not exactly in the last four links but... akin to a GPS of sorts. 
Note:  the exception proves the rule on links or peeks.